Skip to Main Content
Menu
Search
Home
Your Area, Your Say
We Asked, You Said, We Did
Mailing List Signup
Fire Fit Stakeholder Survey
Page 1 of 3
Closes
31 Dec 2028
This service needs
cookies enabled
.
Page 1
Q1. Which delivery site does your feedback relate to?(Please tick one option only)
(Required)
HMP Buckley Hall
HMP Forest Bank
HMP Manchester
HMP Whymott
Other
Location other
location other
Q2. How would you rate your experience of working in partnership with GMFRS on the Fire Fit programme? (Tick one box per row)
(Required)
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Very poor
Overall coordination and planning with GMFRS
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Very poor
Quality of communication before and during delivery
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Very poor
Responsiveness and support from GMFRS staff
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Very poor
Effectiveness of partnership collaboration
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Very poor
Q3. To what extent do you agree with the following statements about partnership working with GMFRS?(Tick one box per row)
(Required)
Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Communication and responsiveness from GMFRS staff met our needs
Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Partnership working with GMFRS was effective
Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree
The collaboration strengthened our working relationship with GMFRS
Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Communication and coordination arrangements were clear and effective
Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Q4. How would you rate the delivery of the Fire Fit programme? (Tick one box per row)
(Required)
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Very poor
Relevance of programme aims to participant needs
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Very poor
Suitability of materials and activities
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Very poor
Inclusivity and accessibility for diverse participants
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Very poor
Q5. To what extent do you agree with the following statements about programme delivery?(Tick one box per row)
(Required)
Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Programme aims and activities were relevant to participant needs
Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree
The programme met or exceeded expectations
Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Delivery methods were appropriate for the participants
Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Equality, diversity, and inclusion were well reflected throughout delivery
Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Q6 Guidance
Participants with Special or Additional Educational Needs (SEN/AEN)
Participants who were non‑English speakers / had English as an Additional Language (EAL)
Participants from ethnic minority backgrounds
Any adjustments, adaptations, or inclusive practices used to support engagement and participation
Q6. Please describe any accessibility or inclusion considerations during the last programme delivery. See above for guidance
Accessibility and/or inclusion adjustments
There is a limit of 1000 characters
There is a limit of 1000 characters
There is a limit of 1000 characters
Q7. Have you observed any positive changes among participants since the start of the Fire Fit programme? (Please tick one option per row)
(Required)
Yes
No
N/A
Reduction in violent behaviour
Yes
No
N/A
Reduction in arson or fire setting behaviour
Yes
No
N/A
Reduction in isolation or withdrawal
Yes
No
N/A
Q8. Please describe any positive impacts for participants with a history of SASH, IEP, CSIP, or gang membership. For example: behaviour, engagement, relationships, or risk reduction.
Positive impacts change
(Required)
There is a limit of 1000 characters
There is a limit of 1000 characters
There is a limit of 1000 characters
Q9. To what extent do you agree that the Fire Fit programme has had the following longer term impacts? (Tick one box per row)
(Required)
Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Participants improved understanding of key safety messages
Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Participants showed improved confidence, communication, or teamwork
Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Participants made safer or more positive decisions
Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree
The programme supported wellbeing, growth, or resilience
Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree
The programme contributed to wider community safety outcomes
Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree
There is clear value in continuing or expanding the Fire Fit programme
Strongly agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly disagree
Q10. From your perspective as a stakeholder, what worked well and what could be improved? Please describe strengths, challenges, and any opportunities for improvement
What works well
(Required)
There is a limit of 1000 characters
There is a limit of 1000 characters
There is a limit of 1000 characters
Q11. If applicable, please share any observed or reported outcomes. (e.g. improved engagement, reduced incidents, confidence gains, organisational benefits)
Outcomes
There is a limit of 1000 characters
There is a limit of 1000 characters
There is a limit of 1000 characters
Continue
Save and come back later
…